Saudi Arabia vs Sweden: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sweden
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 100,461 t against 97,333 t in Sweden, a difference of 3,128 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 60th and Sweden ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,629 t | 96,217 t | 78,588 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 12,835 t | 101,927 t | 89,092 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 76,183 t | 106,706 t | 30,523 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 128,980 t | 112,912 t | 16,068 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 133,431 t | 116,132 t | 17,299 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 109,390 t | 120,353 t | 10,963 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 90,763 t | 119,691 t | 28,928 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Saudi Arabia or Sweden?
- Saudi Arabia, at 100,461 t against 97,333 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
- 3,128 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sweden rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 60th and Sweden ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).