Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Serbia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 61,104 t against 56,596 t in Serbia, a difference of 4,508 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57,895 t | 33,410 t | 24,485 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 63,557 t | 45,073 t | 18,484 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 56,968 t | 72,450 t | 15,482 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Serbia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 61,104 t against 56,596 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 4,508 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Serbia ranks 80th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).