Sierra Leone vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Sierra Leone
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 25,529 t against 22,451 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 3,078 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 99th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21,486 t | 22,731 t | 1,245 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 25,743 t | 23,299 t | 2,443 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Sierra Leone or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 25,529 t against 22,451 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Sierra Leone and South Sudan?
- 3,078 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sierra Leone and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Sierra Leone ranks 99th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).