Slovakia vs Sudan (former): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Slovakia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 145,163 t against 143,677 t in Slovakia, a difference of 1,486 t.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Sudan (former) has been ahead every year.
Slovakia ranks 51st and Sudan (former) ranks 50th of 186 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 104,941 t | 142,062 t | 37,122 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 77,347 t | 161,670 t | 84,323 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 72,127 t | 135,725 t | 63,598 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Slovakia or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 145,163 t against 143,677 t in Slovakia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Slovakia and Sudan (former)?
- 1,486 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Sudan (former)?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Slovakia and Sudan (former) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Slovakia ranks 51st and Sudan (former) ranks 50th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).