Slovenia, Republic of vs Uruguay: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Slovenia, Republic of
- Uruguay
How they compare
Slovenia, Republic of currently reports 9,566 t against 7,795 t in Uruguay, a difference of 1,771 t.
That makes Slovenia, Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Slovenia, Republic of ranks 119th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Slovenia, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia, Republic of | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,939 t | 14,781 t | 7,841 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 7,339 t | 11,251 t | 3,912 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 9,446 t | 10,657 t | 1,211 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 9,826 t | 9,782 t | 43.49 t | Slovenia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Slovenia, Republic of or Uruguay?
- Slovenia, Republic of, at 9,566 t against 7,795 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Slovenia, Republic of and Uruguay?
- 1,771 t, with Slovenia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia, Republic of and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia, Republic of and Uruguay rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Slovenia, Republic of ranks 119th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).