South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- South Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 414,728 t against 390,350 t in South Africa, a difference of 24,378 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 126,605 t | 287,648 t | 161,043 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 150,847 t | 344,240 t | 193,393 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 210,992 t | 356,301 t | 145,309 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 357,659 t | 387,849 t | 30,190 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, South Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 414,728 t against 390,350 t in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 24,378 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do South Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- South Africa ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).