Southern Africa vs Uzbekistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Southern Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 414,728 t against 401,751 t in Southern Africa, a difference of 12,977 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Southern Africa ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 136,303 t | 287,648 t | 151,345 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 159,661 t | 344,240 t | 184,579 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 220,695 t | 356,301 t | 135,606 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 368,578 t | 387,849 t | 19,271 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Southern Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 414,728 t against 401,751 t in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 12,977 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Southern Africa ranks 26th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).