Southern Asia vs Ukraine: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Southern Asia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Southern Asia currently reports 11.05 million t against 2.36 million t in Ukraine, a difference of 8.69 million t.
That makes Southern Asia's figure about 4.7 times Ukraine's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Southern Asia has been ahead every year.
Southern Asia ranks 3rd and Ukraine ranks 6th of 29 groups.
Southern Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Asia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.03 million t | 1.30 million t | 4.72 million t | Southern Asia |
| 2000s | 6.93 million t | 1.33 million t | 5.61 million t | Southern Asia |
| 2010s | 8.72 million t | 1.88 million t | 6.84 million t | Southern Asia |
| 2020s | 10.55 million t | 2.20 million t | 8.36 million t | Southern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Southern Asia or Ukraine?
- Southern Asia, at 11.05 million t against 2.36 million t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Southern Asia and Ukraine?
- 8.69 million t, with Southern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Asia and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Asia and Ukraine rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Southern Asia ranks 3rd and Ukraine ranks 6th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).