Sri Lanka vs Turkmenistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Sri Lanka
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 83,306 t against 72,031 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 11,275 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 70th and Turkmenistan ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17,311 t | 61,588 t | 44,278 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 28,488 t | 91,245 t | 62,757 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 55,363 t | 88,696 t | 33,333 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 77,832 t | 96,871 t | 19,040 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Sri Lanka or Turkmenistan?
- Sri Lanka, at 83,306 t against 72,031 t in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Sri Lanka and Turkmenistan?
- 11,275 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Sri Lanka and Turkmenistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Sri Lanka ranks 70th and Turkmenistan ranks 73rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).