Saint Lucia vs Tonga: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Saint Lucia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 101.62 t against 70.83 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 30.79 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.4 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Saint Lucia ranks 168th and Tonga ranks 165th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 6 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 743.21 t | 172.21 t | 571 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 695.18 t | 151.64 t | 543.54 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 643.28 t | 129.51 t | 513.77 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 674.09 t | 99.74 t | 574.35 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 332.75 t | 73.01 t | 259.74 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 182.84 t | 89.1 t | 93.74 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 96.32 t | 102.07 t | 5.76 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Saint Lucia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 101.62 t against 70.83 t in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Saint Lucia and Tonga?
- 30.79 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Saint Lucia and Tonga rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Saint Lucia ranks 168th and Tonga ranks 165th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).