Tajikistan vs Zambia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Tajikistan
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 72,093 t against 67,497 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 4,596 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 75th and Zambia ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,098 t | 19,874 t | 8,225 t | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 36,314 t | 28,231 t | 8,083 t | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 52,159 t | 66,124 t | 13,965 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 66,135 t | 76,078 t | 9,942 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Tajikistan or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 72,093 t against 67,497 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Tajikistan and Zambia?
- 4,596 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Zambia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Tajikistan and Zambia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Tajikistan ranks 75th and Zambia ranks 72nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).