Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Tajikistan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 67,497 t against 61,104 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6,393 t.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Tajikistan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,098 t | 29,317 t | 1,219 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 36,314 t | 34,914 t | 1,400 t | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 52,159 t | 45,073 t | 7,086 t | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 66,135 t | 72,450 t | 6,314 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Tajikistan or Zimbabwe?
- Tajikistan, at 67,497 t against 61,104 t in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
- 6,393 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Tajikistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Tajikistan ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).