Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Cropland — Area per capita
Cropland — Area per capita over time
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha currently reports 0.76 ha/cap against 0.21 ha/cap in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 0.55 ha/cap.
That makes Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's figure about 3.6 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 11th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 216 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha averaged higher in 4 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3644 ha/cap | 0.5422 ha/cap | 0.1778 ha/cap | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 0.33 ha/cap | 0.447 ha/cap | 0.117 ha/cap | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 0.303 ha/cap | 0.366 ha/cap | 0.063 ha/cap | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 0.491 ha/cap | 0.301 ha/cap | 0.19 ha/cap | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2000s | 0.715 ha/cap | 0.259 ha/cap | 0.456 ha/cap | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2010s | 0.736 ha/cap | 0.239 ha/cap | 0.497 ha/cap | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
| 2020s | 0.75 ha/cap | 0.214 ha/cap | 0.536 ha/cap | Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland — area per capita, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, at 0.76 ha/cap against 0.21 ha/cap in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland — area per capita between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 0.55 ha/cap, with Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for cropland — area per capita?
- Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 11th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cropland — Area per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.