Australia vs Central African Republic: Cropland — Area, per square kilometre

Australia
0.0041 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic
0.0043 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
144th
Central African Republic rank
141st

Cropland — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Central African Republic
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0043 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0041 1000 ha per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Australia ranks 144th and Central African Republic ranks 141st of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Central African Republic in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Central African Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0029 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre Central African Republic
1970s 0.0021 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 ha per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 0.0025 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 0.0032 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.004 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0032 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0041 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland — area, per square kilometre, Australia or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 0.0043 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0041 1000 ha per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cropland — area, per square kilometre between Australia and Central African Republic?
0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central African Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Central African Republic rank globally for cropland — area, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 144th and Central African Republic ranks 141st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Central African Republic: Cropland — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-square-kilometre/australia/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-square-kilometre/australia/central-african-republic/">Australia vs Central African Republic: Cropland — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cropland — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,826 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cropland — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.