Namibia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Cropland — Area, per square kilometre

Namibia
0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
173rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
172nd

Cropland — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 173rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd of 185 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.0008 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0009 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland — area, per square kilometre, Namibia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0011 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cropland — area, per square kilometre between Namibia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for cropland — area, per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 173rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 172nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Cropland — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-square-kilometre/namibia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-square-kilometre/namibia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Namibia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Cropland — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cropland — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,826 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cropland — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.