Which has higher cropland — area, per unit of gdp, Angola or Sao Tome and Principe?

Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.

What is the difference in cropland — area, per unit of gdp between Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP

Angola

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Sao Tome and Principe

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Angola rank

53rd

Sao Tome and Principe rank

52nd

Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP over time

Angola
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Angola, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 53rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 52nd of 183 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Angola
1990s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Angola
2000s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe
2010s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe
2020s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland — area, per unit of gdp, Angola or Sao Tome and Principe?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.
What is the difference in cropland — area, per unit of gdp between Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Angola and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for cropland — area, per unit of gdp?: Angola ranks 53rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 52nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/sao-tome-and-principe/">Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 9,868 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Cropland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.