Belgium vs Norway: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Norway
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belgium rank
153rd
Norway rank
152nd
Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Belgium ranks 153rd and Norway ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland — area, per unit of gdp, Belgium or Norway?
- Norway, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland — area, per unit of gdp between Belgium and Norway?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for cropland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 153rd and Norway ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.