Canada vs Estonia: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP
Canada
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Estonia
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Canada rank
101st
Estonia rank
102nd
Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Canada
- Estonia
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Estonia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Canada ranks 101st and Estonia ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland — area, per unit of gdp, Canada or Estonia?
- Canada, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland — area, per unit of gdp between Canada and Estonia?
- 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Estonia rank globally for cropland — area, per unit of gdp?
- Canada ranks 101st and Estonia ranks 102nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.