Which has higher cropland — area, per unit of gdp, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?

Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.

What is the difference in cropland — area, per unit of gdp between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?

61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP

Chile

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea

0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

125th

Equatorial Guinea rank

122nd

Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Equatorial Guinea

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Chile ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Equatorial Guinea	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
1970s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
1980s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
1990s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Chile
2020s	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland — area, per unit of gdp, Chile or Equatorial Guinea?: Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in cropland — area, per unit of gdp between Chile and Equatorial Guinea?: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Equatorial Guinea?: 61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Chile and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for cropland — area, per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 125th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-area-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/equatorial-guinea/">Chile vs Equatorial Guinea: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland — Area, per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 9,868 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Cropland — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.