Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Saint Lucia: Cropland — Share in Agricultural land

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
18.84 %
in 2024
Saint Lucia
96.27 %
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
28th
Saint Lucia rank
28th

Cropland — Share in Agricultural land over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Saint Lucia
20406080100196119922024

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 96.27 % against 18.84 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 77.43 %.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 5.1 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 28th and Saint Lucia ranks 28th of 32 groups.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 10.89 % 83.41 % 72.51 % Saint Lucia
1970s 11.54 % 84.93 % 73.39 % Saint Lucia
1980s 12.5 % 87.68 % 75.18 % Saint Lucia
1990s 15.17 % 90.17 % 75 % Saint Lucia
2000s 16.37 % 94.25 % 77.88 % Saint Lucia
2010s 17.78 % 96.27 % 78.49 % Saint Lucia
2020s 18.69 % 96.27 % 77.58 % Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland — share in agricultural land, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 96.27 % against 18.84 % in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in cropland — share in agricultural land between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Saint Lucia?
77.43 %, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Saint Lucia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Saint Lucia rank globally for cropland — share in agricultural land?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 28th and Saint Lucia ranks 28th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cropland — Share in Agricultural land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Saint Lucia: Cropland — Share in Agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-share-in-agricultural-land/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-share-in-agricultural-land/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/st-lucia/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Saint Lucia: Cropland — Share in Agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cropland — Share in Agricultural land
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
285 places, 16,764 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.