Albania vs Costa Rica: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Albania
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 7,358 t against 6,981 t in Albania, a difference of 377 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 42nd and Costa Rica ranks 40th of 96 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30,488 t | 31,680 t | 1,192 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 28,076 t | 15,342 t | 12,733 t | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Albania or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 7,358 t against 6,981 t in Albania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Albania and Costa Rica?
- 377 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Costa Rica?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Albania and Costa Rica rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Albania ranks 42nd and Costa Rica ranks 40th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf