Bangladesh vs India: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Bangladesh
- India
How they compare
India currently reports 9.28 million t against 1.51 million t in Bangladesh, a difference of 7.77 million t.
That makes India's figure about 6.2 times Bangladesh's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, India has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 3rd and India ranks 1st of 96 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 128,220 t | 7.17 million t | 7.05 million t | India |
| 2010s | 554,100 t | 9.19 million t | 8.63 million t | India |
| 2020s | 1.41 million t | 10.34 million t | 8.93 million t | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Bangladesh or India?
- India, at 9.28 million t against 1.51 million t in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Bangladesh and India?
- 7.77 million t, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and India?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and India rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Bangladesh ranks 3rd and India ranks 1st of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf