Bangladesh vs Pakistan: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Bangladesh
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 1.58 million t against 1.51 million t in Bangladesh, a difference of 73,090 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Pakistan ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 3rd and Pakistan ranks 2nd of 96 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 107,602 t | 1.23 million t | 1.13 million t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 554,100 t | 1.77 million t | 1.21 million t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1.39 million t | 1.71 million t | 321,852 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Bangladesh or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 1.58 million t against 1.51 million t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 73,090 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Pakistan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Pakistan rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Bangladesh ranks 3rd and Pakistan ranks 2nd of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf