Costa Rica vs Jamaica: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Costa Rica
- Jamaica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 7,358 t against 6,971 t in Jamaica, a difference of 387 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 40th and Jamaica ranks 43rd of 96 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28,767 t | 3,272 t | 25,494 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 15,342 t | 5,646 t | 9,697 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Costa Rica or Jamaica?
- Costa Rica, at 7,358 t against 6,971 t in Jamaica as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Costa Rica and Jamaica?
- 387 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Jamaica?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Costa Rica and Jamaica rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Costa Rica ranks 40th and Jamaica ranks 43rd of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf