Croatia vs Mauritius: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Croatia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 403 t against 325 t in Croatia, a difference of 78 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 102 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.75 t | 1,466 t | 1,391 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 8,966 t | 5,260 t | 3,706 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 65 t | 1,120 t | 1,055 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Croatia or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 403 t against 325 t in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Croatia and Mauritius?
- 78 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Mauritius?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Mauritius rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Croatia ranks 70th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf