Dominican Republic vs Uruguay: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Dominican Republic
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 61,355 t against 26,659 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 34,696 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 2.3 times Dominican Republic's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 96 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33,116 t | 110,772 t | 77,656 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 31,077 t | 78,425 t | 47,348 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Dominican Republic or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 61,355 t against 26,659 t in Dominican Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Dominican Republic and Uruguay?
- 34,696 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Uruguay rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Dominican Republic ranks 24th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf