El Salvador vs Hungary: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Agricultural Use over time
- El Salvador
- Hungary
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 26,152 t against 22,612 t in Hungary, a difference of 3,540 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 26th and Hungary ranks 27th of 96 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20,196 t | 17,890 t | 2,306 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 20,058 t | 17,567 t | 2,491 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) β agricultural use, El Salvador or Hungary?
- El Salvador, at 26,152 t against 22,612 t in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) β agricultural use between El Salvador and Hungary?
- 3,540 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Hungary?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Hungary rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) β agricultural use?
- El Salvador ranks 26th and Hungary ranks 27th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf