Estonia vs North Macedonia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Estonia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 290 t against 205 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 85 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.4 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 65th and North Macedonia ranks 68th of 96 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 467.17 t | 205.5 t | 261.67 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 182 t | 167.5 t | 14.5 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Estonia or North Macedonia?
- Estonia, at 290 t against 205 t in North Macedonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 85 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Estonia and North Macedonia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Estonia ranks 65th and North Macedonia ranks 68th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf