Ethiopia vs New Zealand: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ethiopia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 121,086 t against 97,818 t in New Zealand, a difference of 23,268 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was New Zealand ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 96 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 206,216 t | 169,284 t | 36,932 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 272,023 t | 159,319 t | 112,703 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Ethiopia or New Zealand?
- Ethiopia, at 121,086 t against 97,818 t in New Zealand as of 2017.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Ethiopia and New Zealand?
- 23,268 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2017.
- How do Ethiopia and New Zealand rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Ethiopia ranks 14th and New Zealand ranks 16th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf