Guyana vs North Macedonia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Guyana
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 205 t against 168 t in Guyana, a difference of 37 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 74th of 102 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 655.14 t | 184.86 t | 470.29 t | Guyana |
| 2010s | 762 t | 167.5 t | 594.5 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Guyana or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 205 t against 168 t in Guyana as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Guyana and North Macedonia?
- 37 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and North Macedonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Guyana and North Macedonia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Guyana ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 74th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf