Guyana vs Singapore: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use

Guyana
168 t
in 2011
Singapore
163 t
in 2011
Guyana rank
76th
Singapore rank
77th

Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Guyana
  • Singapore
05001.0k1.5k200220062011

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 168 t against 163 t in Singapore, a difference of 5 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 76th and Singapore ranks 77th of 102 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 628.75 t 171.75 t 457 t Guyana
2010s 762 t 242 t 520 t Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Guyana or Singapore?
Guyana, at 168 t against 163 t in Singapore as of 2011.
What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Guyana and Singapore?
5 t, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Singapore?
6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Guyana and Singapore rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
Guyana ranks 76th and Singapore ranks 77th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
103 places, 1,233 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf