Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 525 t against 403 t in Mauritius, a difference of 122 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Mauritius ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 102 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 847.75 t | 5,085 t | 4,237 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 596 t | 1,120 t | 524 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Luxembourg, at 525 t against 403 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 122 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Luxembourg ranks 66th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf