Luxembourg vs Slovenia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Luxembourg
- Slovenia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 525 t against 445 t in Slovenia, a difference of 80 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 60th and Slovenia ranks 61st of 96 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 847.75 t | 60.25 t | 787.5 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 596 t | 639 t | 43 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Slovenia?
- Luxembourg, at 525 t against 445 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Slovenia?
- 80 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Slovenia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Slovenia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Luxembourg ranks 60th and Slovenia ranks 61st of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf