Madagascar vs Uganda: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use

Madagascar
1,143 t
in 2009
Uganda
823 t
in 2011
Madagascar rank
63rd
Uganda rank
65th

Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Madagascar
  • Uganda
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200220062011

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 1,143 t against 823 t in Uganda, a difference of 320 t.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.4 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 65th of 102 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Madagascar or Uganda?
Madagascar, at 1,143 t against 823 t in Uganda as of 2009.
What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Madagascar and Uganda?
320 t, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Uganda?
7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.
How do Madagascar and Uganda rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
Madagascar ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 65th of 102 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
103 places, 1,233 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf