Mauritius vs Slovenia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Mauritius
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 445 t against 403 t in Mauritius, a difference of 42 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Slovenia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 62nd and Slovenia ranks 61st of 96 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,982 t | 26 t | 1,956 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 5,481 t | 48.8 t | 5,432 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1,120 t | 639 t | 481 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Mauritius or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 445 t against 403 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 42 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Mauritius ranks 62nd and Slovenia ranks 61st of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf