Mexico vs Saudi Arabia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Mexico
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 353,489 t against 260,576 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 92,913 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.4 times Saudi Arabia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 6th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 102 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 431,233 t | 245,068 t | 186,165 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 353,489 t | 428,000 t | 74,511 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Mexico or Saudi Arabia?
- Mexico, at 353,489 t against 260,576 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Mexico and Saudi Arabia?
- 92,913 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Saudi Arabia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Mexico and Saudi Arabia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Mexico ranks 6th and Saudi Arabia ranks 9th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf