Mozambique vs Switzerland: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Mozambique
- Switzerland
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 5,184 t against 3,480 t in Switzerland, a difference of 1,704 t.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.5 times Switzerland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 47th and Switzerland ranks 49th of 96 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,608 t | 3,124 t | 515.67 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 5,162 t | 2,979 t | 2,182 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Mozambique or Switzerland?
- Mozambique, at 5,184 t against 3,480 t in Switzerland as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Mozambique and Switzerland?
- 1,704 t, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Switzerland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2011.
- How do Mozambique and Switzerland rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Mozambique ranks 47th and Switzerland ranks 49th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf