Nicaragua vs Serbia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,648 t against 849 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 799 t.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.9 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 56th of 96 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,675 t | 13,400 t | 724.75 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 11,714 t | 7,583 t | 4,131 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1,648 t against 849 t in Nicaragua as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 799 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Nicaragua ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 56th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf