Nicaragua vs Slovenia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Agricultural Use over time
- Nicaragua
- Slovenia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 849 t against 445 t in Slovenia, a difference of 404 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.9 times Slovenia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 58th and Slovenia ranks 61st of 96 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,878 t | 25 t | 10,853 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 28,447 t | 40.12 t | 28,407 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 81,299 t | 255.33 t | 81,043 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) β agricultural use, Nicaragua or Slovenia?
- Nicaragua, at 849 t against 445 t in Slovenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) β agricultural use between Nicaragua and Slovenia?
- 404 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Slovenia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Nicaragua and Slovenia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) β agricultural use?
- Nicaragua ranks 58th and Slovenia ranks 61st of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf