North Macedonia vs Singapore: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- North Macedonia
- Singapore
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 205 t against 163 t in Singapore, a difference of 42 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.3 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 68th and Singapore ranks 71st of 96 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 166.75 t | 171.75 t | 5 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 167.5 t | 242 t | 74.5 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, North Macedonia or Singapore?
- North Macedonia, at 205 t against 163 t in Singapore as of 2011.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between North Macedonia and Singapore?
- 42 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do North Macedonia and Singapore rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- North Macedonia ranks 68th and Singapore ranks 71st of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf