Panama vs Philippines: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Panama
- Philippines
How they compare
Panama currently reports 69 t against 8 t in Philippines, a difference of 61 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 8.6 times Philippines's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 81st and Philippines ranks 84th of 102 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,113 t | 108,799 t | 106,685 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 1,749 t | 127,728 t | 125,980 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 69 t | 112,195 t | 112,126 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Panama or Philippines?
- Panama, at 69 t against 8 t in Philippines as of 2021.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Panama and Philippines?
- 61 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Philippines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Panama and Philippines rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Panama ranks 81st and Philippines ranks 84th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf