Peru vs Saudi Arabia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Peru
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 260,576 t against 131,478 t in Peru, a difference of 129,098 t.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 2.0 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Peru ranks 11th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 96 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 124,977 t | 204,045 t | 79,068 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 157,382 t | 474,714 t | 317,332 t | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 150,568 t | 235,862 t | 85,294 t | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Peru or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 260,576 t against 131,478 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Peru and Saudi Arabia?
- 129,098 t, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Saudi Arabia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Peru ranks 11th and Saudi Arabia ranks 8th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf