Senegal vs Slovak Republic: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Senegal
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 1,699 t against 1,665 t in Senegal, a difference of 34 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 55th and Slovak Republic ranks 54th of 96 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 2 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,692 t | 6.5 t | 8,686 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 14,243 t | 3,574 t | 10,669 t | Senegal |
| 2020s | 1,665 t | 5,114 t | 3,449 t | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use, Senegal or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 1,699 t against 1,665 t in Senegal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use between Senegal and Slovak Republic?
- 34 t, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Slovak Republic?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
- How do Senegal and Slovak Republic rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — agricultural use?
- Senegal ranks 55th and Slovak Republic ranks 54th of 96 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf