Belarus vs Guatemala: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity over time
- Belarus
- Guatemala
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 3,078 t against 2,646 t in Guatemala, a difference of 432 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Belarus ranks 36th and Guatemala ranks 37th of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.41 t | 548.94 t | 546.53 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 1.22 t | 1,805 t | 1,804 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 1,540 t | 734.48 t | 805.37 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity, Belarus or Guatemala?
- Belarus, at 3,078 t against 2,646 t in Guatemala as of 2021.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity between Belarus and Guatemala?
- 432 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guatemala?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Guatemala rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity?
- Belarus ranks 36th and Guatemala ranks 37th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf