Finland vs New Zealand: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity over time
- Finland
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.5 t against 0.23 t in Finland, a difference of 0.27 t.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Zealand ahead.
Finland ranks 83rd and New Zealand ranks 81st of 88 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.2 t | 142.47 t | 129.27 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 3.5 t | 558.17 t | 554.67 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1.35 t | 0.5 t | 0.85 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity, Finland or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.5 t against 0.23 t in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity between Finland and New Zealand?
- 0.27 t, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity?
- Finland ranks 83rd and New Zealand ranks 81st of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf