Lithuania vs Tunisia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 223,571 t against 131,760 t in Lithuania, a difference of 91,811 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.7 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Tunisia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 10th and Tunisia ranks 7th of 88 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 681,480 t | 1.11 million t | 428,351 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 767,637 t | 504,131 t | 263,506 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 248,112 t | 299,915 t | 51,804 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity, Lithuania or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 223,571 t against 131,760 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity between Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 91,811 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tunisia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Tunisia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 10th and Tunisia ranks 7th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf