Luxembourg vs Nicaragua: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 902.09 t against 675 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 227.09 t.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 47th and Nicaragua ranks 50th of 88 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 179.04 t | 250 t | 70.96 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 843.58 t | 371.56 t | 472.03 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity, Luxembourg or Nicaragua?
- Luxembourg, at 902.09 t against 675 t in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity between Luxembourg and Nicaragua?
- 227.09 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Nicaragua?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Luxembourg and Nicaragua rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 47th and Nicaragua ranks 50th of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf