Brazil vs Czechia: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value over time
- Brazil
- Czechia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 171.45 1000 USD against 101.11 1000 USD in Czechia, a difference of 70.34 1000 USD.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.7 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 54th and Czechia ranks 55th of 83 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,073 1000 USD | 122.53 1000 USD | 4,950 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2010s | 2,054 1000 USD | 105.82 1000 USD | 1,948 1000 USD | Brazil |
| 2020s | 412.97 1000 USD | 109.59 1000 USD | 303.39 1000 USD | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value, Brazil or Czechia?
- Brazil, at 171.45 1000 USD against 101.11 1000 USD in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value between Brazil and Czechia?
- 70.34 1000 USD, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Czechia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Czechia rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value?
- Brazil ranks 54th and Czechia ranks 55th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf