Costa Rica vs Ireland: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value over time
- Costa Rica
- Ireland
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 395.69 1000 USD against 392.42 1000 USD in Ireland, a difference of 3.27 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ireland ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 51st and Ireland ranks 52nd of 88 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.76 1000 USD | 6.97 1000 USD | 18.79 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 923.75 1000 USD | 144.75 1000 USD | 779 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 399.7 1000 USD | 353.66 1000 USD | 46.04 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value, Costa Rica or Ireland?
- Costa Rica, at 395.69 1000 USD against 392.42 1000 USD in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value between Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 3.27 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ireland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Ireland rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value?
- Costa Rica ranks 51st and Ireland ranks 52nd of 88 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf