Croatia vs Sweden: Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value
Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value over time
- Croatia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 17.88 1000 USD against 9.36 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 8.52 1000 USD.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.9 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sweden ahead.
Croatia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 67th of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.285 1000 USD | 0.535 1000 USD | 0.25 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 84.87 1000 USD | 19.97 1000 USD | 64.91 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2020s | 152.26 1000 USD | 20.72 1000 USD | 131.54 1000 USD | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value, Croatia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 17.88 1000 USD against 9.36 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value between Croatia and Sweden?
- 8.52 1000 USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sweden?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Sweden rank globally for diammonium phosphate (dap) — export value?
- Croatia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 67th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Diammonium phosphate (DAP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf